Please note that your current login session is only valid on the English site (letpub.com). You will not be signed in on other language versions of the site. If you wish to place an order, please return to the English site.
Increasingly authors need animations for digital manuscript submissions and conference presentations or lectures. These <15 second animations can be powerful tools for communicating exceedingly difficult scientific concepts. They can provide a tremendous advantage during the peer review process when submitted as part of a competitive manuscript. Utilize our team of exceptional graphic designers to craft these animations for you. LetPub will present you with an intuitive and cleverly designed animation according to your preferences.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: We will provide any necessary revisions until you are satisfied with the design of your animation.
In-scope client-requested revisions are accommodated as part of the purchase price for the service. In-scope revisions constitute those revisions necessary to refine the final deliverable to meet the original project brief, pending client approval. All revisions requested after delivery of the completed project will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub. Out-of-scope revisions—including, but not limited to, requests for novel designs beyond the original brief, requests for design elements beyond the contracted service, and requests to revise elements previously approved by the client—will be subject to an additional fee at the discretion of LetPub. All LetPub artwork and image-based projects are service-based transactions, and are not eligible for either full or partial refunds once work has begun. Initial payment for the project constitutes a non-refundable deposit for time and materials.
Loading......
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.