Journal Recommendation
Selecting a reputable journal in which to present your work is an important step for a successful publication strategy. Some research fields have thousands of journals, and most authors find the selection process difficult. Choosing the wrong journal can mean rejection or a long review, both of which delay publication. With LetPub’s Journal Recommendation service, papers are matched to editors with relevant subject matter expertise. All of our editors are frequently invited to serve as reviewers by scientific journals and they have experience publishing and reviewing articles of all types (e.g., original research, reviews, case reports, surveys, and short communications). They have advanced degrees (PhD and MD) or professional and educational backgrounds, and there is an editor for every discipline, such as clinical medicine, chemistry, physics, engineering, life sciences, and social sciences. They will assess the key scientific factors in your manuscript and recommend suitable journals to ensure an efficient publication process.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the first 3 recommendations do not meet the needs you specify at the time service purchase, we will provide 2 complimentary recommendations to supplement your target journal selection list.
Any author-specified restrictions, including index restrictions, may limit the options that can be provided or require concessions to other parameters of the recommendation process. Recommendation of a journal does not guarantee acceptance. Rejection is entirely at the discretion of the journal and may occur for a variety of reasons for which LetPub does not hold responsibility, including being out of scope. For further information, see our FAQ.
Shao-Qing Cai
Peking University (China)
Hao Wang
Northwest A&F UniversityLetPub has edited many of my articles. The editors are very professional and the revisions are well done. The feedback from the editors and reviewers were very good and long-term cooperation will be considered later.
Zhe Wang
Central South UniversityI am very satisfied with the polishing service provided by LetPub. Due to the strict deadline, I asked for a quick turnaround. The staff was very patient and very active in helping me. I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to the LetPub staff!
Daiga Bitena
Riga Stradins University (Latvia)Thank you LetPub very much for polishing my article. The journal accepted it for publishing right after language revision. Before the journal editors referred me to LetPub, I had given my manuscript to another language editor, but it did not go through. I am grateful for LetPub's professional and detailed approach. LetPub's service is highly professional and totally worth the price.
Xin Qu
Anyang Institute of TechnologyThis is the second time I have asked LetPub to help polish the language. After the article has been edited by LetPub, the language was greatly improved. I will continue to cooperate with LetPub in the future! ! !
Nan Sun
Tsinghua University (China)We used LetPub’s English language editing service, our paper was revised three times, and each time was very professional and detailed. We contacted the Client Communications Specialist by email throughout the whole process, they answered our doubts patiently, and the processing speed was very fast. Many thanks for LetPub's professional and meticulous service, and it is very helpful for future paper writing.
Kaipeng Wang
South China Normal UniversityLetPub's service is very good. They are all modified for native English-speaking professionals. After the modification, the language of the article was much smoother, which solves the grammar problem of my article well.
Weitao Yang
Tongji UniversityLetPub is quick, the customer service is good, and the quality of the polished articles is great. The article was successfully accepted by the editorial department!
Loading......
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.