2025-03-28

No, cannot find it.

2025-03-28

Hello, can you check the specific status of your submission through the AISWEI official WeChat account?

2025-03-28

Please share the timeline for submitting to Science Bulletin. We welcome everyone to share in the field of new energy batteries.
3.07, submitted
3.12, under consideration
3.20, Under Review
We are still following up, not sure if it has been sent out for external review yet. Is it normal that the Elsevier public account cannot be found? Or do reviewers need to accept the invitation to see it? How long does it take to receive the review comments?

2025-03-12

Submitted a review article to a small research group, not by invitation. It was found that many people were not very clear about the submission process of the journal, and the comments section was not very detailed. It was confusing to distinguish between "Under Consideration" and "Under Review". Below is the submission process:
January 6, 2025: Submitted, showing "Under Consideration"
January 22, 2025: Under Review
February 6, 2025: Received feedback: all three reviewers suggested minor revisions
February 13, 2025: Resubmitted after revisions
February 14, 2025: Under Review
March 4, 2025: Received feedback: all three reviewers suggested acceptance, editor requested revisions to figures and additional tweets
March 5, 2025: Resubmitted after revisions
March 12, 2025: Accepted.

2025-01-09

In the field of materials, at the level of AM/EES, one cannot usually submit to AEM/AFM/ACS nano/ESM. If these journals are still out of reach, then one would typically consider Science Bulletin. When looking for a job, an AFM paper is definitely more useful than Science Bulletin, by a thousand times. AFM is widely recognized as a top journal, whereas Science Bulletin is...

2025-01-09

Looking at your ID, I can tell that you usually use a Huawei phone, wear Li-Ning clothes, and enjoy watching the movie "Wolf Warrior".

2024-12-30

Carrying around a contemporary masterpiece is quite annoying. The relationship-based journal has hardly any serious articles. Those who can say hello can usually get published, while those who can't are never given a chance to be reviewed. They publish a bunch of letters every year to boost their impact factor.

2024-12-20

Please translate the following passage into English: 1

2024-12-01

The upstairs is really dark, and if you can submit to JACS, you should definitely submit to JACS first. Just because some articles are not accepted by JACS doesn't mean they are not good. Academician Xue Qikun's unconventional quantum Hall effect paper was not accepted by Science, but was submitted to NSR. Professor Li Yuliang's graphene acetylene paper was not accepted by any first-tier journals, but was eventually published in CC. It's important to focus on the quality of the articles rather than the prestige of the journal. It can only be said that this journal's electrocatalysis is actually similar to JACS, but not every article surpasses JACS.

2024-11-27

I have never submitted to this journal, but I support domestic journals. The two people above seem to be eager to see Chinese journals decline, not supporting them and still making sarcastic remarks here. Speaking Chinese but not looking forward to China's success.